gunsANYONE : g.j. lau | church/STATE : schildbach | netocracy : chaney | economy[GAMBLING] : vanEsch |
*issue 8.0
*subscribe
enter your email address to receive information and updates
*archives

archives page

 

*contact us

the tax people love to pay
( gambling )
by stephen van esch
print friendly version

In every country in the world the word "tax" likely stirs up some feeling of anger or regret. A tax means less money to spend on things you like. Oh sure, the services are supposedly there, but many people, whether in a high tax country like Canada or a low tax country like the United States, see taxes as evil, unnecessary or both. Calls for higher taxes are usually met with outrage and lower taxes are usually used as a carrot for the willing donkey named "voters" when election season rolls around. Governments can rise or fall on their tax policies.

So what if a government managed to find a way of increasing taxes without the attendant anger? What if they found a way to make the population glad they were paying taxes?

Well, they have. It's called gambling.

There's a little saying I've heard bandied about recently: Gambling is a tax on people who can't do math. In an attempt to boost their sagging fortunes, cities and racetracks are making heavy investments in casino and slot machine palaces. It seems to be working rather well. A nearby racetrack, once the best empty parking lot around for a late night romantic rendezvous, now bustles with activity. Cars idle impatiently before the doors open at 11:00 in the morning and the lot is packed late into the night.

Not all the profits from the new racetrack/slot house stay with the owners, of course. A percentage goes to the county to cover infrastructure bills and additional police vehicles and personnel. A substantial amount is left over for other county projects.

Where are the howls of protest here? People willing to shell out an extra hundred dollars (or more) a week at the slots most likely kick up quite a fuss when federal, provincial, gas, etc. taxes go up by one percent.

Hey, don't get me wrong, I think it's a fine thing that an additional tax area has been opened up. So much the better for me that someone else has elected to pay more than their fair share of taxes. However, governments should wake up and realize the gambling model holds immense potential for taxation.

Think about it. A gambling hall run entirely by the government could easily take in a much larger piece of the pie than simply taking a cut of the huge takes gambling houses are already making. Governments could easily run theme casinos (Income Tax Casino, Federal Tax Casino, Provincial Tax Casino, etc.) that could bring in many additional tax dollars for every area government is responsible for. Like the idea of National Health Care? Blow your bucks at the Health Care Casino! You'll feel better and the government will get more money.

Of course, this model already exists in the form of raffles and lotteries but governments should push a little harder for a bigger slice of the pie. You've got a segment of the population (plus busloads of visitors from other countries) willing to pay more taxes. Take advantage of it!

I'll admit there is a certain element of greed at work here. If more taxes come out of the pockets of those who can't do math, fewer tax dollars will come out of my own in the long run. Oh well, those are the benefits you reap when you pay attention in math class. I knew they would be good for something.

Copyright © 2000 Stephen Van Esch All Rights Reserved

Stephen Van Esch is a writer and instructional designer living near Toronto, Canada. He is the owner and CEO of the Text Pound (http://www.textpound.com).

comment? discuss this article on our discussion board

copyright© 1999 - 2000 bravenewMEDIA