|
Well. We thought we had seen dot-bombs in April,
but that was just the beginning. Suck.com is gone. Feed.com
is gone. Salon.com is disappearing piece by piece, and charging
admission. It'll be gone soon too, trust me.
I will miss them. Especially Filler on Wednesdays.
But you know what?
I am secretly gleeful that this one (massive)
corner of the world has successfully resisted commercialisation.
Resisted? Nay, spurned! It will remain a haven for labours
of love and obsessive-compulsive weirdoes, because the real
beauty of the Internet is the interactivity, the message boards,
the fact that any schmoe with too much time on his hands can
build a shrine to whatever weird object fills him with delight
and/or dread. The number of haiku humour sites, for example,
is stunning. Who can resist "The Epic of Gilgamesh retold
as Olestra Haiku"? Certainly not I.
Of course, if the reading public is providing
the content, they aren't going to be willing to pay for it.
I might pay for my weekly Polly Esther dose, but I won't pay
to read myself.
And while there is much out there that is worth
paying for, it's next to impossible for a site to charge for
access when so much is available for nothing. Why buy the
loaf? Even those that do attempt to charge will soon discover
that it is all too easy for savvy readers to circumvent the
system (sometimes it's as simple as substituting "channel"
for "www" in the URL), or to simply cut'n'paste
and post on a mirror site on the other side of the planet.
The On-Line Guitar Archive is a good example; long before
the Napster controversy, musos were going after OLGA for hosting
thousands of illicit guitar tabs. There are now OLGA mirror
sites around the globeunsueable and unstoppable.
Which of course comes back to the issue of intellectual
property rights. What is the value of an idea? How can it
be determined? Are we not undermining the importance of our
favourite musicians/authors/pundits, et cetera, when we refuse
to hand over a penny for their work?
Reminds me of when I was a starving student,
quibbling over the four-dollar price tag on a book (second-hand)
that I'd been looking for. And realising that I'd spend that
amount in ten seconds or less if I was in a bar. Priorities.
I do value my favourite columnists. And I am
sad to see them go. But part of me is giggling at the triumph
of the original ideals of the Internet. I mean, people used
to think that they could stop advertisements from ever encroaching
upon the Web. It was to be an idyll free from such vulgar
motivationsa place for the free exchange of ideas.
At the current rate of regression, we will soon
all go back to Usenet, tapping out IRC commands and squinting
at monochrome orange and black (my school colours!) 11"
monitors, and starting fires to keep warm by rubbing sticks
together. Somebody will see something repulsive on a Christina
Aguilera anti-fan site and will exclaim out loud. Perhaps
someone nearby will overhear, and wonder: What is that strange
noise? And they will discover that it is possible for humans
to interact directly, without the aid of electronic devices.
At least if they are in the same room.
Well, maybe that's an exaggeration. At any rate,
the Internet seems to have actually managed to resist/throw
off commercialism, for now at any rate, much as the original
information-wants-to-be-free Usenet hippies hoped it would
be.
Except for the porn sites, I mean.
Copyright © 2001 Jennifer
Amey. All Rights Reserved.
Jennifer Amey is a writer
living in Toronto.
|