|
We
all have an angle--perhaps perspective is a better
word--on the world we inhabit. And because individual
perspective tends to be limited, even in information-rich
environments, I find it helpful to try and look
at things from different angles. Lately I've
been thinking about how our use of the World Wide
Web is primarily information-centric, and how easy
it is to overlook the fact that the Web is the latest
in a series of communications technologies that
allow us to bridge significant physical distances.
The
telephone was one of the first technologies to do
this, although it's primarily used for person-to-person
communications. In addition, the telephone is somewhat
limited in that it can't effectively provide access
to stored information. Radio and television are
also leapfrog technologies (and television is significant
in that it engages both sight and hearing), but
these are really broadcast media, not communications
technologies.
I
first played digital leapfrog on the Web in 1994,
when I visited a site that featured a number of
high-quality photographs of the ceiling of the Sistine
Chapel. I've never been to the Vatican (although
I'd seen pictures, like many people), but here I
was soaring within inches of Michelangelo's masterpiece
while sitting in my office cubicle in a Seattle
suburb. Not only did the Web allow me to see the
painting, it also allowed me to scrutinize Michelangelo's
work more closely than I could if I were standing
beneath it. The thousands of miles separating me
from the painting's location were transcended by
the digital underpinning of the Web, as was the
fact that it exists on a surface--a ceiling--that's
much more out of reach for its immediate observers
than art that's displayed on walls or floors. From
the Web I could study it from different angles and
zoom in for detail, almost as if I were a fly buzzing
about the room.
Unlike
the telephone, a Web browser is essentially a data
access tool. However, the combination of the Web's
vast scale and the way it's used by individuals
makes it appear to be something of a personal communications
medium. One of the most amazing things about the
Hypertext Transfer Protocol--the http: in every
Web address--is the way it transfers information
so quickly over significant distances. This ability
to communicate data at or near the speed of light
is what makes any digital technology appear to be
instantaneous (agonizingly slow dial-up connections
notwithstanding, of course), and to my way of thinking
is what makes the Web so magical.
The
Web is doing away with an issue that most of us
probably haven't thought much about before--how
stored information's potential is limited by its
location. That is, information is like the proverbial
tree in the uninhabited forest that falls without
making a sound--or is it? Can information be meaningful
if it exists without anyone being aware of it? Whether
we like it or not, the increasingly ubiquitous nature
of the Web seems to be slowly but inexorably rendering
this question moot.
As
the Web grows and flourishes, we gain access to
an increasing amount of information. We say this
is liberating, and in many ways it is, but we still
need to verify and understand information properly
before we can rely on it and use it effectively.
Remember how Pierre Salinger so innocently believed
the information he obtained from the Web about TWA
Flight 800? Wouldn't it be amazing if all information
on the Web was truly reliable?
Anyway,
although this may sound hopelessly silly and nostalgic,
I was somewhat disappointed when I purchased a new
car and saw that it had a digital odometer. No more
watching the numbers ascend towards the sky as the
odometer's wheels slowly turned; now they were just
liquid crystals that changed instantly. I realized
that something more than physical distance had been
leapfrogged--that even the way we measure physical
distance has changed.
Digital
technologies have "exploded" the passage of time
and the existence of distance, and sometimes the
effects of this explosion seem like a runaway chain
reaction. Do the seemingly instantaneous workings
of digital technologies affect our comprehension
of nature's circular rhythms and cycles? Do we sense
that time is speeding up because we can now do so
many things quickly; things that once involved great
distances and vast amounts of time? Could the Web
perhaps be pointing us towards a better understanding
of the space/time continuum put forth in the theory
of relativity?
Regardless
of how we answer these questions, digital technologies
have profoundly affected us by providing new perspectives;
that alone provides us with sufficient reason to
appreciate them.
©
Copyright 2000 by Stephen Wacker. Contact Stephen
Wacker at swacker@accessone.com regarding use of
this copyrighted material.
Stephen
Wacker writes about technology, culture and
society. His career as an information technology
professional has focused primarily on communications
and the Internet. Mr. Wacker also writes about contemporary
popular music and is an accomplished songwriter
and guitarist.
|